
Anthony completed the text with a minimal amount of errors. He operated at an independent level on this particular text. The DRA level was a 12 on the story, The Great Pumpkin. His significant error was in regards to contractions, a syntax error. He read both as though they were not a contraction, indicating that he understands what they are. From my limited Spanish background, I do know that contractions are not used and thus Anthony does not have a lot of practice in using them in his native tongue. It would be good to go over contractions with him, their purpose, their construction and their usage. Some short independent practice on contractions and then a reassessment should be sufficient.
Julie completed the same text also with a minimal amount of errors. She operated at an independent level on this particular text. Her significant error had to do with vocabulary, mistaking great for giant and struggling twice with the word cradle, prompting intervention from the teacher. Helping to refresh Julie's word attack skills would help her make sense of the words she struggled with on this particular reading selection.
Morrow, in her text Literacy Development in the Early Years: Helping Children Read and Write, recommends Running Records be given once a month to track students' progress with reading. Certainly, they could be a valuable tool in judging the progress made by ELL students as they work at acquiring reading skills. It is recommended, however, that another tool or method be utilized to assess fluency as Running Records really have no section that does that.
No comments:
Post a Comment